MT’s Biggest Schools Are Now Losing Millions, Here’s Why

A summary of the key information is provided at the bottom of the article.

BUTTE, MT - Montana’s higher education system is taking a major financial hit, and the fallout could be devastating for students, faculty, and the state’s educational future.

Get our free mobile app

The University of Montana (UM) has just lost $6 million in federal funding, a move that will likely lead to job cuts and a reduction in educational programs.

At the heart of the controversy?

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an agency newly helmed by tech mogul Elon Musk, has made sweeping cuts aimed at diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives—slashing millions in grant money once earmarked for universities nationwide.

Now, UM is left scrambling to deal with the consequences.

The Budget Cut That Rocked the University of Montana

The University of Montana had been awarded two $3 million contracts by the Department of Defense (DOD) to run from 2023 to 2026.

These funds were intended to bridge the gap between urban and rural students through civics education, democracy promotion, and political engagement initiatives.

The funding also supported trips to Washington, D.C. and the development of civics curricula for K-12 schools across Montana.

However, on Tuesday, the Department of Defense announced that the funding was gone.

The cuts were part of a broader effort spearheaded by DOGE, which aims to eliminate DEI-based programs from federal spending.

While the Pentagon is framing this as a return to fiscal responsibility, university officials are calling it a devastating setback.

“We’re still figuring out the impact, but we believe there will be an impact on positions and personnel,” said Dave Kuntz, the director of strategic communications for UM.

Half of the original funds had already been spent, and now, the university is left in limbo, unsure of how to proceed with programs that had been carefully designed to educate students on democracy, civic engagement, and American political systems.

Why Is DOGE Targeting Montana Universities?

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is a newly formed agency under Elon Musk’s leadership, tasked with trimming federal spending on programs deemed "non-essential" by the Pentagon.

DOGE’s decision to cut the University of Montana’s funding is part of a larger movement to eliminate DEI-focused grants nationwide.

UM was not the only institution hit. Other cuts included:

• $1.9 million for a “holistic DEI transformation” initiative

• $1.6 million to the University of Florida to study climate vulnerability in the African Sahel

Musk himself has been vocal about his disdain for DEI initiatives, calling them "wasteful distractions" from the core missions of education and defense.

His critics argue, however, that this is a politically motivated move aimed at dismantling programs that promote inclusion and representation.

A Case for the Cuts: Why DOGE’s Decision Makes Sense

While the funding cuts at the University of Montana have sparked controversy, supporters of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) argue that these reductions are a necessary step toward fiscal responsibility, refocusing government spending on core priorities, and depoliticizing military funding.

Critics of DEI-related grants contend that the Department of Defense (DOD) should not be funding education programs that do not directly enhance national security. Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesperson, reinforced this position by stating:

“This stuff is not a function of our military.”

From this perspective, civics education, while important, is not within the scope of defense spending.

Proponents of the cuts argue that military funding should be reserved for improving national defense capabilities, supporting active service members, and ensuring military readiness—not for programs aimed at promoting civic engagement.

What This Means for Montana’s Universities

The immediate impact of this funding cut is uncertain but potentially grim.

Here’s what’s likely to happen next:

• Personnel Cuts: Many faculty and staff positions at UM were funded by these grants, and now, their futures are on the chopping block.

• Fewer Educational Opportunities: Programs designed to engage students in politics and civic life will be drastically reduced or eliminated altogether.

• Ripple Effects Across Montana: UM’s funding cut is just the beginning. If DOGE continues down this path, other universities in Montana could face similar losses, reducing the quality of education across the state.

For students, this means fewer resources, fewer opportunities, and a shrinking university experience—all at a time when higher education is already under financial strain.

Is This the End of Civics Education in Montana?

While DOGE’s decision is a significant blow, it does not mean civics education will vanish entirely.

However, universities will now be forced to rely on state funding and private donors to continue these programs.

Kuntz emphasized that the need for civic education has never been greater, especially in an era of increasing political polarization.

“Canceling this grant will limit the education opportunities for Montana's students about civics, American freedom, and patriotism.”

The big question now is: Will Montana’s universities find alternative funding, or will these programs disappear for good?

With DOGE’s aggressive stance against DEI programs, this may only be the beginning of a much larger battle over the future of higher education in America.

Summary:

Montana’s higher education system is facing a financial crisis as the University of Montana (UM) loses $6 million in federal funding, a move expected to lead to job cuts and reduced educational opportunities.

The funding, originally awarded by the Department of Defense (DOD) to support civics education and democracy programs, was eliminated as part of a broader effort by the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, to cut spending on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

Officials at UM warn that the cuts will significantly impact faculty positions and student programs aimed at bridging urban-rural divides, promoting political engagement, and fostering civic education.

DOGE’s actions have sparked controversy, with critics arguing that the move is politically motivated and could set a dangerous precedent for future education funding.

As Montana’s universities scramble to find alternative funding sources, the future of civics education in the state remains uncertain. If similar cuts continue, the quality and scope of higher education in Montana could face long-term consequences.