How MT’s New Controversial ‘Bathroom Law’ Affects Everyone

A summary of the key information is provided at the bottom of the article.

BUTTE, MT - In March 2025, Montana enacted a new law that restricts access to bathrooms, locker rooms, and sleeping quarters in public buildings based on sex assigned at birth.

Get our free mobile app

Signed by Governor Greg Gianforte, the law affects all state-owned and state-funded facilities—including schools, libraries, prisons, and domestic violence shelters.

The policy has drawn both support and opposition, raising questions about privacy, safety, legal interpretation, and daily life for many Montanans.

Let's do a breakdown on what the law entails and how it could affect people across the state.

What the Law Says

The law requires all public buildings in Montana to maintain separate spaces for men and women.

It defines sex strictly based on chromosomes and reproductive biology, thereby recognizing only two sexes: male and female.

Under this law, transgender individuals must use facilities that align with their sex assigned at birth, not their gender identity.

This applies to a wide range of facilities, including:

• State Capitol buildings

• Public K–12 schools and universities

• Correctional facilities

• Public libraries

• State-funded domestic violence shelters

Notably, the law does not explain how officials should verify an individual's sex, leaving enforcement mechanisms undefined.

Legal Context and Ongoing Debate

The law’s definition of sex as binary and rooted in biology runs counter to a 2024 Montana district court ruling that struck down a similar definition as unconstitutional. Despite this, lawmakers moved forward, passing the measure with support from the Republican majority.

Proponents of the law, such as Rep. Kerri Seekins-Crowe, argue that it is designed to protect privacy and preserve “safe spaces” for women.

They maintain that separate facilities based on biological sex are necessary in sensitive environments like bathrooms and changing rooms.

Opponents—including Democratic lawmakers and civil rights advocates—warn that the law could make life more difficult for transgender individuals and increase the risk of public harassment or confrontation.

Rep. Zooey Zephyr of Missoula, a transgender lawmaker, argued that the legislation may lead to some individuals feeling entitled to question or police others’ gender in public, potentially creating unsafe or uncomfortable situations for all.

Practical Implications for Montanans

The law impacts not only transgender people but also facility operators and the general public. For example:

• Transgender individuals may face confusion or distress over which facilities they are legally permitted to use, especially if they have undergone medical or social transition. A transgender man with facial hair and a deeper voice, for example, would now be legally required to use the women’s restroom in state buildings.

• Public employees and administrators are not given guidance on how to enforce the law, raising concerns about privacy, liability, and implementation. There is also uncertainty around whether questioning someone’s sex could lead to discriminatory practices or confrontations.

• Legal and financial consequences may arise. The law allows people to sue facilities that fail to restrict access based on the new definition of sex. Successful plaintiffs may recover nominal damages—typically $1—but facilities may be required to pay their legal fees.

Conclusion

Montana’s new gendered bathroom law introduces significant changes to how public spaces are structured and accessed across the state.

While supporters view the law as a necessary measure to uphold biological distinctions in sensitive spaces, critics say it places a burden on transgender individuals and could create new social tensions.

As the law moves forward—despite potential legal challenges or reinterpretations—it will likely shape public policy, civil discourse, and daily life for many Montanans in the months and years ahead.

Summary:

Montana's new law requires people to use bathrooms, locker rooms, and sleeping areas in public buildings based on their sex assigned at birth, defining sex strictly as male or female based on biology. The law applies to schools, libraries, prisons, and other state-funded facilities, and does not specify how enforcement should occur.

Supporters say it protects privacy and safety, while critics argue it could create confusion and increase public harassment, especially for transgender individuals. The law also allows individuals to sue facilities for non-compliance, potentially leading to legal and financial consequences.