New Report Shows MT Tax Loophole That Saves You Thousands

A summary of the key information is provided at the bottom of the article.

BUTTE, MT - Imagine this: two neighboring million-dollar homes nestled along the Flathead River, both boasting stunning views, sprawling acreage, and luxury amenities like docks and putting greens.

Get our free mobile app

They look like the quintessential Montana dream. But take a peek at their tax bills, and the story becomes a nightmare for the average Montanan.

One of these properties, classified as residential, paid a whopping $9,100 in property taxes last year. Meanwhile, its agricultural neighbor—a “gorgeous Montana river estate” with no visible signs of serious farming—paid $2,100 less.

The secret? Montana’s tax system, which hands out massive breaks to property owners who claim their land is agricultural, no matter how tenuous their farming operations may be.

SCROLL DOWN, ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW

ARTICLE CONTINUES HERE

A Loophole for the Elite

Under Montana law, agricultural land is taxed based on its "production potential," not its market value.

This means that even million-dollar estates can qualify for agricultural tax breaks if they manage to squeak out a meager $1,500 in agricultural income—an amount that hasn’t been updated since 1986. A few cherry trees, a couple of horses, or even some barley planted for show is all it takes to unlock thousands of dollars in savings.

The result? Owners of high-end properties, including former Goldman Sachs executives, CEOs, and even Governor Greg Gianforte, are paying pennies on the dollar while average Montanans see their property taxes skyrocket.

In some cases, residential landowners pay hundreds of dollars per acre, while their agricultural-classified neighbors get away with paying as little as $2 an acre.

You Pay More So They Pay Less

This isn’t just a matter of fairness—it’s costing you money.

Every dollar these wealthy landowners save shifts the tax burden onto hardworking Montanans. With residential property taxes climbing an average of 21% between 2022 and 2023, many families are struggling to keep up, even as their wealthy neighbors enjoy tax rates originally designed to preserve family farms, not fund private playgrounds.

Take Governor Gianforte’s property as an example. His 11-acre estate, classified as agricultural, saw land taxes of just $66 in 2023. Across the street, his residential neighbor, who owns a similarly valued property, paid more than $800 per acre.

A Broken System in Dire Need of Reform

Montana lawmakers have been wringing their hands over this issue for decades, yet little has been done to close the loophole.

Efforts to raise income thresholds or tie agricultural tax breaks to genuine farming operations have been met with fierce resistance. Why? Because the system benefits the wealthy, and they’re not giving it up without a fight.

Proposals on the table for 2025 include raising the income threshold to $4,000, eliminating automatic agricultural status for properties over 160 acres, and taxing the land under luxury homes at residential rates.

While these changes could bring fairness to the system, they face steep political opposition.

Time to Speak Up, Montana

As Montanans, we pride ourselves on our agricultural heritage. But are we willing to let the super-rich exploit that legacy while the rest of us struggle?

The next legislative session is around the corner. If you’re tired of carrying the tax burden for Montana’s wealthiest, now is the time to make your voice heard. Call your representatives and tell them: enough is enough. Montana’s tax system should work for everyone—not just the elite.

Summary:

Montana’s property tax system grants significant tax breaks to properties classified as agricultural, valuing the land based on its agricultural production potential rather than its market value. This policy, intended to support farming and ranching, has been increasingly exploited by owners of high-value properties, including luxury estates, who meet the minimal income threshold of $1,500 from agricultural activities.

Critics argue the system unfairly benefits wealthy landowners, including public figures like Governor Greg Gianforte, while shifting the tax burden to residential property owners. Reform proposals for the 2025 legislative session include raising income thresholds, eliminating automatic agricultural status for large properties, and taxing land under luxury homes at higher rates. Proponents aim to balance supporting legitimate agricultural operations with addressing tax inequities, though past efforts have faced strong political resistance.